Compliance Intelligence · Powers every review

    One review standard, built from everything your team already knows.

    Compliance Intelligence turns your brand documents, compliance playbooks, knowledge library, and reviewer history into a single standard that every review applies, instead of a generic AI checklist.

    One customized standard, every content type
    Creator content · Instagram caption content thumbnail
    Creator content · Instagram caption

    "Our new serum cures dry skin overnight." #ad

    Unsupported claim, flagged before publishing
    Same standard
    Marketing asset · Paid social ad content thumbnail
    Marketing asset · Paid social ad

    "Clinically studied to support skin hydration."

    Approved phrase, cites the claims library
    How it works

    One review standard, built from everything your team already knows.

    Brand documents, compliance playbooks, a knowledge library, and reviewer intelligence feed into a single standard, so every review applies the same judgment, across audio, video, and captions alike.

    Brand Documents

    The style guides, claims libraries, and approved language your team already maintains.

    Compliance Playbooks

    The category rules and disclosure requirements that apply to your content.

    Knowledge Library

    Regulatory guidance and precedent your reviewers already reference, case by case.

    Reviewer Intelligence

    Patterns from what your reviewers have actually approved, revised, and rejected.

    One review standard

    Every review measures content against the same standard.

    Whatever a reviewer opens, an influencer draft, an affiliate post, or a brand-owned ad, PinkSpider checks it against the same brand documents, playbooks, and library, refined by how your reviewers actually decide.

    Brand documents

    Your existing guidance, made usable for review.

    Style guides, claims libraries, and regulatory guidance already exist somewhere. Compliance Intelligence turns them into context a review can actually apply, instead of a PDF nobody has time to reread.

    Style and voice guides

    Approved tone, terminology, and formatting your team already maintains.

    Claims and language libraries

    The exact phrases that are approved, and the ones that aren't.

    Category and regulatory guidance

    Internal policy and counsel guidance specific to your industry.

    Compliance playbooks

    The right standard for the program, not a generic one.

    A playbook applies the rules that fit a specific program and audience, such as a health-claims playbook for a skincare partnership, or a disclosure playbook for an affiliate program, so a review doesn't lean on one catch-all policy.

    • Playbooks map to a category, program, or audience.
    • A creator submission is checked against the playbook that actually applies to it.
    • Playbooks update as guidance changes, without rewriting every past review.
    See how playbooks vary by industry
    Playbook applied by program
    Health & WellnessAffiliate ProgramRetail Promotion
    Efficacy claims require substantiation on file before publishing.
    Testimonials must include a results-may-vary disclaimer.
    Knowledge library

    Retrieve the rules that fit this exact submission.

    A knowledge library holds far more guidance than any single review needs. Scoping by brand, product, channel, and audience retrieves only the rules that actually apply, each one citing where it came from.

    BrandGlow Skincare
    ProductHydrating Serum
    ChannelTikTok,Instagram
    AudienceGeneral consumer
    Retrieved rules

    Disclosure must appear in the caption's first line using #ad or #sponsored.

    Glow Skincare brand document, Disclosure Policy v3

    Approved: "supports skin hydration." Avoid unsupported terms like "clinically proven" or "cures."

    Glow Skincare claims library

    Sponsored skincare content on TikTok requires a platform-native paid partnership label in addition to the caption disclosure.

    Health & Wellness compliance playbook
    Reviewer intelligence

    The system learns from how your team already reviews, but never on its own.

    When reviewers keep making the same call on a recurring pattern, that judgment becomes a proposed learning: a specific rule with the evidence behind it, surfaced for a human to edit, reject, test, or publish.

    A proposed learning stays inactive until it's published. Nothing it surfaces changes how content gets reviewed until a person makes that call.

    Proposed learning

    Weak hook flagged in the first three seconds

    Pattern detected across reviewer decisions · Creative feedback

    22 prior reviewsReviewers consistently flagged a static product shot as a weak open for short-form video.
    4 creators affectedThe same creative note recurred across four different creators on the Glow Skincare account.
    1 overrideOne reviewer approved a static open only when it was paired with a trending audio hook.
    EditRejectTestPublish
    Five review dimensions, not a generic checklist

    Your standard, named explicitly.

    Every submission is checked against five named dimensions, not one vague 'brand guidance' pass, so a reviewer never has to guess which standard applies.

    FTC / regulatory

    Disclosure rules and required language that apply to the content.

    Industry rules

    Category-specific requirements set by the program or audience.

    Brand alignment

    Approved and prohibited language, checked against the submission.

    Audience alignment

    Whether the content fits the audience it's reaching.

    Content safety

    Claims and imagery that could put a creator or brand at risk.

    Evidence and human governance

    PinkSpider surfaces flags and evidence. People make the call.

    Every retrieved rule cites its source, every flag traces to a caption, transcript, or frame, and every proposed learning waits on a human to edit, reject, test, or publish it. PinkSpider does not change your review standard on its own, and it does not guarantee compliance.

    Common questions

    What teams ask before they see the workflow.

    No. It surfaces flags, retrieved rules, and evidence for a reviewer. Publishing a proposed learning, and every review decision, stays with a person.

    From your own brand documents, compliance playbooks, and knowledge library, plus category guidance PinkSpider maintains, always cited to its source.

    It looks for patterns in how your reviewers have actually decided, then proposes a specific rule. It stays inactive until a person edits, tests, or publishes it.

    No tool can guarantee compliance. PinkSpider is built to make the evidence behind a decision clear and consistent, not to replace legal or compliance judgment.

    See your own standard applied

    Bring us the brand documents and guidance your team already has.

    We'll show you how Compliance Intelligence turns them into a review standard, with a human keeping the final call.

    Request a Demo →