Influencer Review · Before publication

    Compliant creator content, approved in minutes, not days.

    Influencer Review automatically checks paid creator content against your brand and category guidance before it goes live, grounding every flag in the submitted caption, transcript, or frame.

    Instagram Reel
    @brownbearika
     
    Compliance Score54%Higher Risk
    Content Safety80%
    Regulatory20%
    Industry Standards85%
    Audience Alignment78%
    The approval problem

    A submission stalls for more reasons than a messy inbox.

    It's not just where the content lives. Several people need to weigh in, each in their own thread, and creators are left guessing what to fix. Influencer Review puts the evidence, the reviewers, and the guidance in one place.

    Evidence lives in five placesA caption, script, and rough cut land in different tools, so a reviewer has to track each one down before checking anything.
    Too many people, too many threadsBrand, legal, and compliance often weigh in separately over email, Slack, and DMs, so no one has the full picture at once.
    Feedback creators can't act onA flat rejection doesn't say what to fix, so creators guess, and the next draft still misses the mark.
    What gets reviewed

    Every layer of a submission, reviewed together.

    Video content isn't just a caption. Every piece of a submission stays connected so nothing gets checked in isolation.

    !my anxiety is basically gone, not-allowed disease claim for a dietary supplement
    Suggested revision

    I've been taking this every night, and it's part of my wind-down routine. It's been a game changer.

    !BURNS FAT 3X FASTER, quantified claim outside the brand's approved substantiation
    Suggested revision

    Change overlay to "SUPPORTS MY FITNESS GOALS."

    !#1 DERMATOLOGIST RECOMMENDED, superiority claim unsupported by the brand's evidence
    Suggested revision

    Badge changed to "DERMATOLOGIST TESTED," matching the brand's on-file evidence.

    !Not sponsored, material connection undisclosed, disclosure is required
    Suggested revision

    #ad, but I'm obsessed with this. My skin looks so much brighter.

    Five review dimensions, not a generic checklist

    Five dimensions. One clear yes or no.

    Every submission is checked against five named dimensions, not a single vague "brand guidance" pass, so a reviewer never has to guess which standard applies. Select one to see the guidance behind it.

    Brand guidance · Glow Skincare
    Use "glow up," not "flawless" or "perfect skin," to match the brand's body-neutral voice.
    Product packaging shown on camera must match the current SKU and label design on file.
    See it in the product

    See the actual workspace.

    A look at the workspace reviewers actually use to check a submission, flags and evidence side by side.

    Revision guidance creators can use

    A next step for creators, not a rejection.

    Instead of a flat "denied," creators get a specific note: what to change and why.

    Creator @brownbearika
    @brownbearikaSkincare serum
    Disclosure

    #ad only appears in a comment, not the caption itself.

    Next step: Add #ad within the caption's first line.

    Needs changesSent automatically · 2 min ago
    Creator @drewliftsit
    @drewliftsitProtein powder
    Claims

    "Clinically proven" isn't backed by substantiation on file.

    Next step: Replace with "supports muscle recovery."

    Needs changesSent automatically · 18 min ago
    Creator @sanaskin_
    @sanaskin_Haircare oil
    Brand alignment

    "Flawless hair" conflicts with the brand's body-neutral voice.

    Next step: Swap in "glow up" to match approved language.

    Needs changesSent automatically · 1 hr ago
    Creator @marcustechreview
    @marcustechreviewWireless earbuds
    Content safety

    A competitor's product is named directly in the voiceover.

    Next step: Remove the competitor name to avoid trademark risk.

    Needs changesSent automatically · 3 hr ago

    Clear enough to act on: revision guidance names the exact issue and a workable fix, so creators can act quickly and your team spends less time back and forth.

    Reviewer Intelligence

    The system learns from how your team already reviews.

    When reviewers keep making the same call on a recurring pattern, that judgment doesn't stay locked in one reviewer's head. It becomes a proposed learning: a specific rule surfaced for a human to approve, not applied automatically.

    Once approved, it sharpens every FTC/regulatory, industry, brand, audience, and content-safety review it applies to, so consistency doesn't depend on which reviewer is on shift.

    See how Reviewer Intelligence fits the platform
    Proposed learning

    "Clinically proven" flagged across multiple brands

    Pattern detected across reviewer decisions · Claims language

    17 prior reviewsReviewers consistently flagged "clinically proven" and similar language as unsubstantiated across skincare and wellness submissions.
    5 creators affectedThe same claims note recurred across five different creators spanning three brand accounts.
    0 overridesNo reviewer has approved this phrasing without a substantiation file attached.
    EditRejectTestPublish
    Decision history and collaboration

    Automate the process, first draft to final approval.

    Every comment, flag, and decision stays attached, so context is never lost in a thread. Select a step to see what the creator receives at that point.

    What the creator sees
    Revision note to @brownbearika

    Add #ad within the caption's first line, it only appears in a comment now. Replace "clinically proven" with "supports skin hydration."

    Connected to Academy

    Every new creator starts with a lesson.

    Before a creator's first post goes live, Academy walks them through your brand's voice and disclosure rules, so review starts with fewer surprises.

    Triggered automatically: @brownbearika joined the program this week.

    3-minute lesson
    Auto-assigned on day one
    Matched to what needs reinforcing
    See how Academy works
    Welcome to the family.
    LUMON Creator AcademyWelcome to the family.

    Calm, honest wellness for real routines. Let's get you ready to post.

    At a glance

    What's included

    • Caption, transcript, audio, video, and frame review together
    • Brand-specific disclosure rules and approved claims
    • Flags linked to the exact line or frame
    • Revision guidance creators can act on
    • Decision history and comments in one timeline
    • Recurring flags can assign an Academy lesson
    Evidence, not guesses

    Every flag should show you why it exists.

    A flag without a source is just an opinion. Every flag here points to the line, frame, or second behind it.

    Common questions

    What teams ask before they see the workflow.

    Yes. Influencer Review works with the caption, transcript, frames, and visual context, so a flag points to a specific piece of the submission.

    Yes. Brand-specific rules and approved claims are reviewed alongside the content, not a separate document.

    It automates the vast majority of routine checks and only surfaces what needs a second look, so your team can focus on the decisions that matter and keep final say.

    The creator gets revision guidance tied to the flag, not a generic rejection.

    Make approvals faster

    Bring us the review process that keeps getting stuck.

    We'll show you how Influencer Review fits your brand guidance, creators, and your team's final say.

    Request a Demo →